Nikita (Luc Besson, 1990) DVDRip VOSE MKV

[unskinnyboy]

...from the Special Edition DVD...



DVD Back:


Tagline: The Hit of Paris and London Has Come to America.

Plot Outline: Convicted felon Nikita, instead of going to jail, is given a new identity and trained, stylishly, as a top secret spy/assassin.

Plot Synopsis: Nikita is a young lady who with two nihilist friends commit robbery and murder while on drugs. After her trial she is not executed or taken to prison, but to a school for special operatives. She is told that Nikita no longer exists and she will be trained to pay back society for what she has done, as a spy/assassin. She is trained for over two years and with no warning is handed a gun in a restaurant and told to kill the man at the next table as her handler leaves.

Reviews: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100263/externalreviews

IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100263/
Rating: 7.5/10 (13,544 votes)
French Release Date: February 21, 1990
DVD Release Date: July 1, 2003
Awards & Nominations: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100263/awards

Country: France / Italy
Language: Italian / French

Specs:
Video: x264 @ ~1773 kbps
Audio: OGG Vorbis 2Ch 192 kbps
Resolution: 720 x 288
Aspect Ratio: 2.500 (5:2)
Framerate: 23.976 fps
Runtime: 01:57:21.020

Subtitles (muxed in): English, Español, Français

Screenshots:








Nikita.1990.SE.DVDRip.x264.Subs_Eng_Es_Fr-C00LdUdE.mkv

[FLaC]

Wow, sounds really great. Unfortunately, as i share the pc, i have to download rips compatibles with dvd players, cause i dont have the TV and the PC avalaible at the same time.

[cernickalo]

Well, I think that this change to matroska is a very good idea. Since the files that usb used to share were not compatible with many standalone Divx players (because of Custom Quantizer Matrix or more than two consecutive b-vop's, things that can not be detected while downloading), he'd be free to use advanced containers and audio/video codecs. Also, no one should download now these files expecting to play them in a Divx player only to find out that they can't be played properly.

See ya.

[unskinnyboy]

Unless you have a Jurassic age standalone, most of the newer ones support CQMs and max. b-vops > 2. If there are people still clinging onto their old standalones, now is the time to switch. Newer models are quite advanced in the range of content they can play.

@cernickalo, As for the number of cons. b-vops, I do give all the frame-type information in every release thread, so I am not sure what you mean by saying it "cannot be detected while downloading".

[cernickalo]

If there are people still clinging onto their old standalones, now is the time to switch.

This is a great idea... specially if you are an actionist of some company of electronics . If you are the owner of one of those Jurassic players, maybe you think in a quite different way. I own two of them (Kiss DP450 and Pioneer DV 580), and I really like very much how they work, so you can imagine my point of view about this.

Okay. Suppose that I decide to buy a brand new standalone Divx player... Which one should I choose? How can I be sure that the chosen one will support any kind of CQM? What if a wonderful new matrix appears next week? Will it be supported, too? The only thing that I do really know is: H.263 and MPEG matrix will be supported, and they're good enough for me.

As for the number of cons. b-vops, I do give all the frame-type information in every release thread, so I am not sure what you mean by saying it "cannot be detected while downloading".

I was not talking about files found in a forum, where the technical especifications are exposed, but about files found by searching with emule, and utilities like Avicheck or emule itself, that give you a number of useful data in order to know if it is compatible with a Divx player.

Anyway, you give enough information about frame-type, that's true, but you never say what quantization matrix you have used. I have noticed that most of people who share advanced filesize use custom matrix, and they don't mention it neither.

This is why I said that the change to matroska is a good idea. I have always shared fully compatible files (quality enough with no problems for playback). I also understand people who share not-compatible-at-all files (with advanced codecs for highest quality).

But I can't guess what is the reason to share partially compatible files, that can't be played in many models of players and have lower quality than using AVC codecs. I think they are halfway to everywhere.

See ya.

[unskinnyboy]

If there are people still clinging onto their old standalones, now is the time to switch.

This is a great idea... specially if you are an actionist of some company of electronics . If you are the owner of one of those Jurassic players, maybe you think in a quite different way. I own two of them (Kiss DP450 and Pioneer DV 580), and I really like very much how they work, so you can imagine my point of view about this.

Okay. Suppose that I decide to buy a brand new standalone Divx player... Which one should I choose? How can I be sure that the chosen one will support any kind of CQM? What if a wonderful new matrix appears next week? Will it be supported, too? The only thing that I do really know is: H.263 and MPEG matrix will be supported, and they're good enough for me.

H.263 and MPEG are very basic stuff, anything will support that. I have heard that the Oppo players are very good: http://www.oppodigital.com/. Not sure if they are available in Spain, though.

As for the number of cons. b-vops, I do give all the frame-type information in every release thread, so I am not sure what you mean by saying it "cannot be detected while downloading".

I was not talking about files found in a forum, where the technical especifications are exposed, but about files found by searching with emule, and utilities like Avicheck or emule itself, that give you a number of useful data in order to know if it is compatible with a Divx player.

Anyway, you give enough information about frame-type, that's true, but you never say what quantization matrix you have used. I have noticed that most of people who share advanced filesize use custom matrix, and they don't mention it neither.

There is only a handful of people who does AFR, and if you are in FH, you know them all already - mostly me, willy_br, stereozulu and the UnSeeN group and everyone uses CQMs, always. Part of the AFR effort is also to make good quality rips, not just to bloat the filesize.

This is why I said that the change to matroska is a good idea. I have always shared fully compatible files (quality enough with no problems for playback). I also understand people who share not-compatible-at-all files (with advanced codecs for highest quality).

But I can't guess what is the reason to share partially compatible files, that can't be played in many models of players and have lower quality than using AVC codecs. I think they are halfway to everywhere.

See ya.

I used to use Matroska a lot before (2 years ago). Those FH guys dragged me back to avi, complaining about standalone compatibility . This x264-MKV release was experimental, to see how the users will take it, but doesn't look like a lot of people are enthusiastic about it. I might have to switch back to XviD again. And contrary to what you think about the compatibility, a lot of users are able to play my rips on their standalone. Some aren't, agreed. But to make the rips compatible for them involves a lot of quality degradation, which I am reluctant to make.

[cernickalo]

I have heard that the Oppo players are very good: http://www.oppodigital.com/.

To buy a new DVD/Divx player right now should be a waste of money, when HD is about to come. HD-DVD players are supposed to support VC-1 and MPEG4/AVC codecs. I'm looking forward to buy something like this.

There is only a handful of people who does AFR, and if you are in FH, you know them all already - mostly me, willy_br, stereozulu and the UnSeeN group and everyone uses CQMs, always.

In the other hand, people like Os Iluminados still use MPEG, and rulle is also back to compatible matrix. But it'd be a good idea to mention that you are using CQM, anyway, between all the information you provide. It's really annoying to download a 2 Gb file just to delete it, don't you think so?

...to make the rips compatible for them involves a lot of quality degradation, which I am reluctant to make.

CQM are quite unpredictable. You need to encode the whole movie to compare the result, that may be better or worse than using a classic matrix (it is the same thing than using QPel). The differences will always be so slight that you only would appreciate them with a PC monitor and still images.

Wait. To make the rips compatible for only some of the standalone players involves a real quality degradation from using matroska and AVC codecs, right?

See ya.

[mortimerbrewster]

Sorry alguien que me explique como funciona los archivos mkv para poder visualizarlos en un reproductor de sobremesa... me estoy aficcionando peligrosamente a los unskinnyboyripeazos... you are my lord, my god, unskinny

[elguaxo]

MKV/x264 son aún 0% compatible con reproductores de sobremesa.

[hank_quinlan]

Si aparece Jeanne Moreau, hay que localizar una fuente Columbia cueste lo que cueste.

[hank_quinlan]

De la edición Columbia a la MGM EE hay una diferencia importante, ambas traen el AR correcto, pero son muy diferentes.




En breve abriré un [OFR] para un dual a 1/2 dvd con Didees-SixOfNine.

[yojimbo]

Excelent! I don't know why I still don't have this one...
Thx