[quote="Wolfman"]

[quote]There is so much to say about the way Otto Preminger directs a movie. His previous success, "Laura" (1944), was a blockbuster, but lacked the murky influence of film noir that was so popular during this time. Sure there was some film noir technique employed in "Laura", but not enough. However, "Laura" still holds it's own even by today's standards and the media, along with the marketing people, have done us all a favor (this time!!!) in keeping this classic alive and popular.
Needless to say, "Fallen Angel" redeems Preminger's ability to present a film in the classic noir of it's time and because of this is competitive with Billy Wilder's "Lost Weekend" (1945) and "Double Indemnity" (1944), both huge successes with audiences. But what about "Fallen Angel"?
Despite the cinematography and the super cast, "Fallen Angel" went to the chopping block via the critics. The critics rated this film as mediocre and audiences stayed away. Alice Faye, in her only dramatic role, left the movies in disgust partly because of what the critics did to this film. Why?
From beginning to end, the viewer is treated to some of the best cinematography that this art form had to offer. The way sluttish Linda Darnell is depicted before the camera is a treat for the eye and enhances her sexuality. The way Percy Kilbride is smitten with Darnell throughout the movie, up to the climax is an essential link to the continuity of the movie as well as with the novel by Marty Holland. The way Charles Bickford sits behind the lunch counter, slowly sipping his coffee sending a message to the viewer that something deep inside him is simmering, ready to explode. We all know that Bickford, along with Kilbride, Dana Andrews and Bruce Cabot all are victims to the whims of the dark Darnell.
And the way the blonde, good and virtuous Faye is contrasted with the dark, bad and selfish Darnell is more proof that this film should be marketed for the masses. The plot is strong, the camera work of Joseph LaShelle and, especially the film direction by Preminger rates this movie as one of the best of it's time.
Yes, this film rates up there with "Laura", "Double Indemnity" and "The Lost Weekend"; all three super classics from this era and available on VHS and DVD.[/quote]
And if this is anything to go by: I know from reading the box that this is one of the two favorite Preminger movies of William Friedkin; the other of course being "Laura".
Specs:
Filesize.....: 699 MB (or 716,540 KB or 733,736,960 bytes)
Runtime......: 01:33:08 (139,707 fr)
Video Codec..: XviD
Video Bitrate: 915 kb/s
Audio Codec..: 0x0055(MP3) ID'd as MPEG-1 Layer 3
Audio Bitrate: 127 kb/s, monophonic VBR
Frame Size...: 480x368 (1.30:1) [=30:23]
Subs:
IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037691/[/quote]
Subtítulos en castellano provistos y sincronizados por duby, por aquí.
Salud, comas y República
********************************************
********************************************
Nuevo DVDRip VOSE, cortesía de unskinnyboy.
Specs:
Video: XviD ISO MPEG-4 @ ~1949 kbps
Audio: AC3 2Ch (2/0) 192 kbps
Resolution: 656 x 480
Aspect Ratio: 1.367 (~11:8)
Framerate: 23.976 fps
Runtime: 01:37:11.32
OpenDML (AVI v2.0)
Interleave: 96 ms (2.3 v.frames), preload=96
Audio frames: Aligned on interleaves
Video: 1.32 GB (90.75%)
Audio: 133 MB (8.94%)
AVI Overhead: 4.61 MB (0.31%)
Subtitles: English, Español, Português Brasileiro
Screenshots:






Audio en español, gracias a labellaotero:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=8VOQOQCF
Subtítulos SRT, cortesía de labellaotero:
- Español: Titles.
- English: Titles.
English, Español Subs:
Legenda em Português Brasileiro